Litcius/Paper detail

Comparative study on the specimen thickness measurement using EELS and CBED methods

Yoon‐Uk Heo

2020Han-guk hyeonmigyeong hakoeji/Applied microscopy30 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Two thickness measurement methods using an electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) and 10a convergent beam electron diffraction (CBED) were compared in an Fe-18Mn-0.7C alloy. The thin foil specimen was firstly tilted to satisfy 10a two-beam condition. Low loss spectra of EELS and CBED patterns were acquired in scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and TEM-CBED modes under the two-beam condition. The log-ratio method was used for measuring the thin foil thickness. Kossel-Möllenstedt (K-M) fringe of the [Formula: see text] diffracted disk of austenite was analyzed to evaluate the thickness. The results prove the good coherency between both methods in the thickness range of 72 ~ 113 nm with a difference of less than 5%.

Topics & Concepts

FOIL methodMaterials scienceTransmission electron microscopyElectron diffractionDiffractionRange (aeronautics)SpectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)AlloyCrystallographyOpticsChemistryPhysicsMetallurgyNanotechnologyComposite materialQuantum mechanicsChromatographyMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of SteelsElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy TechniquesMicrostructure and mechanical properties