Litcius/Paper detail

Ethics and Collateral Findings in Pragmatic Clinical Trials

Stephanie R. Morain, Kevin P. Weinfurt, Juli Bollinger, Gail Geller, Debra Mathews, Jeremy Sugarman

2020The American Journal of Bioethics19 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) offer important benefits, such as generating evidence that is suited to inform real-world health care decisions and increasing research efficiency. However, PCTs also present ethical challenges. One such challenge involves the management of information that emerges in a PCT that is unrelated to the primary research question(s), yet may have implications for the individual patients, clinicians, or health care systems from whom or within which research data were collected. We term these findings as ?pragmatic clinical trial collateral findings,? or ?PCT-CFs?. In this article, we explore the ethical considerations associated with the identification, assessment, and management of PCT-CFs, and how these considerations may vary based upon the attributes of a specific PCT. Our purpose is to map the terrain of PCT-CFs to serve as a foundation for future scholarship as well as policy-making and to facilitate careful deliberation about actual cases as they occur in practice.

Topics & Concepts

DeliberationCollateralClinical trialFoundation (evidence)Identification (biology)Engineering ethicsScholarshipHealth careCollateral damagePsychologyPrimary careMedicinePolitical scienceFamily medicineLawPathologyBotanyEngineeringPoliticsBiologyCriminologyEthics in Clinical ResearchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeBiomedical Ethics and Regulation
Ethics and Collateral Findings in Pragmatic Clinical Trials | Litcius