Litcius/Paper detail

An illustrated review of bleeding assessment tools and common coagulation tests

Carolyne Elbaz, Michelle Sholzberg

2020Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis35 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Recognizing the complexity of coagulation tests and currently used anticoagulants, we developed this illustrated review on bleeding assessment tools and common coagulation screening tests. Quantitative bleeding assessment tools (BATs) are available to standardize the bleeding history and improve the pretest probability prior to coagulation testing. We describe use of BATs and the principles, indications, and limitations of the prothrombin time (PT)/International Normalized Ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and 50:50 mix. Use of these tests to identify coagulation factor deficiencies, specific and nonspecific inhibitors, coagulopathy of liver disease, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and commonly used anticoagulant medications are reviewed. Current literature suggests that unnecessary coagulation testing is rampant. The PT and APTT have astoundingly low sensitivity (1.0%-2.1%) for detection of clinically significant bleeding disorders. Thus, current guidelines recommend against the use of screening PT and APTT in preoperative patients undergoing noncardiac/vascular surgery.

Topics & Concepts

Partial thromboplastin timeMedicineProthrombin timeCoagulopathyCoagulation testingCoagulationIntensive care medicineCoagulation DisorderDisseminated intravascular coagulationAnticoagulantSurgeryInternal medicinePlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsHeparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and ThrombosisAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes