Litcius/Paper detail

Vet-OncoNet: Malignancy Analysis of Neoplasms in Dogs and Cats

Katia Pinello, Irina Amorim, Isabel Pires, Ana Canadas‐Sousa, José Catarino, Pedro Faísca, Sandra Branco, Maria C. Peleteiro, Daniela Silva, Mílton Severo, João Niza‐Ribeiro

2022Veterinary Sciences32 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Analysis of canine and feline tumor malignancy data can help clinicians identify high-risk patients and make more accurate decisions. Based on a sample of 16,272 cancer records, including 3266 cats and 13,006 dogs, collected from January 2019 to December 2021 in the Vet-OncoNet Network database, this study aimed to compare the tumor malignancy profile between cats and dogs, considering animal-related factors (sex, age, and breed), topography, and geographic location using a mixed-effects logistic regression model. Cats had a higher proportion of malignant tumors (78.7%) than dogs (46.2%), and the malignancy profile was very different regarding tumors' topographies. The mean age of malignant tumors occurred eight months later than benign ones (9.1, SD = 3.4; 9.8, SD = 3.2), in general. Species (OR = 3.96, 95%CI 3.57: 4.39) and topography (MOR = 4.10) were the two most important determinants of malignancy risk. Female dogs had a higher risk than male dogs (OR = 1.19, 95%CI 1.08: 1.31), which does not appear to be the case in cats (OR = 0.98, 95%CI 0.77: 1.23). Breed contributed significantly to differences in malignancy risk in dogs (MOR = 1.56), particularly in pit bulls and boxers. District of residence was not so relevant in predicting malignancy risk (MOR = 1.14). In both species, the risk of malignancy increased by approximately 20% every three years. It could be hypothesized that species differences in genetic structure may contribute to tumor malignancy.

Topics & Concepts

MalignancyCATSBreedMedicineLogistic regressionCancerInternal medicineBiologyAnimal scienceVeterinary Oncology ResearchVirus-based gene therapy researchMicrobial infections and disease research