Litcius/Paper detail

Association between intrauterine device type and risk of perforation and device expulsion: results from the Association of Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Device study

Jennifer Gatz, Mary Anne Armstrong, Debbie Postlethwaite, Tina Raine‐Bennett, Giulia Chillemi, Amy Alabaster, Maqdooda Merchant, Susan D. Reed, Laura Ichikawa, Darios Getahun, Michael J. Fassett, Jiaxiao Shi, Fagen Xie, Vicki Y. Chiu, Theresa M. Im, Harpreet S. Takhar, Jinyi Wang, Catherine W. Saltus, Mary E. Ritchey, Alex Asiimwe, Federica Pisa, Juliane Schoendorf, Yesmean Wahdan, Xiaolei Zhou, Shannon Hunter, Mary S. Anthony, Jeffrey F. Peipert

2022American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology12 citationsDOI

Topics & Concepts

MedicineIntrauterine deviceUterine perforationLevonorgestrelPerforationObstetricsRetrospective cohort studyIncidence (geometry)Relative riskUterine ruptureConfidence intervalGynecologyPopulationSurgeryFamily planningUterusInternal medicineEnvironmental healthPunchingMaterials scienceMetallurgyOpticsPhysicsResearch methodologyReproductive Health and ContraceptionReproductive Health and TechnologiesGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Association between intrauterine device type and risk of perforation and device expulsion: results from the Association of Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Device study | Litcius