Litcius/Paper detail

Covid-19 Lockdown Cost/Benefits: A Critical Assessment of the Literature

Douglas W. Allen

2021International Journal of the Economics of Business182 citationsDOI

Abstract

An examination of over 100 Covid-19 studies reveals that many relied on false assumptions that over-estimated the benefits and under-estimated the costs of lockdown. The most recent research has shown that lockdowns have had, at best, a marginal effect on the number of Covid-19 deaths. Generally speaking, the ineffectiveness stemmed from individual changes in behavior: either non-compliance or behavior that mimicked lockdowns. The limited effectiveness of lockdowns explains why, after more than one year, the unconditional cumulative Covid-19 deaths per million is not negatively correlated with the stringency of lockdown across countries. Using a method proposed by Professor Bryan Caplan along with estimates of lockdown benefits based on the econometric evidence, I calculate a number of cost/benefit ratios of lockdowns in terms of life-years saved. Using a mid-point estimate for costs and benefits, the reasonable estimate for Canada is a cost/benefit ratio of 141. It is possible that lockdown will go down as one of the greatest peacetime policy failures in modern history.

Topics & Concepts

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PeacetimeEconomicsPoint estimation2019-20 coronavirus outbreakCost–benefit analysisSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Point (geometry)EconometricsPercentage pointActuarial scienceStatisticsGeographyMathematicsMedicinePolitical scienceOutbreakArchaeologyPathologyDiseaseVirologyFinanceGeometryInfectious disease (medical specialty)LawCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Covid-19 Lockdown Cost/Benefits: A Critical Assessment of the Literature | Litcius