Assessment of MeMed BV assays for differentiating between bacterial and viral respiratory infections
Karen C. Carroll
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Distinguishing bacterial from viral infections remains a challenge due to clinically indistinguishable presentations. Non-infectious conditions such as malignancy, pulmonary emboli and rheumatological conditions may also present with fever. Consequently, patients are often over-treated with antimicrobial agents or may not receive adequate therapy. AREAS COVERED: This article provides a comprehensive review of a novel protein host-signature assay, the MeMed BV assay, that distinguishes bacterial from viral infections. The focus is on the use of the test in respiratory tract infections including assay performance characteristics, clinical profiles and data on cost-effectiveness. The changing landscape from the use of single inflammatory biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein, to alternative and diverse host signature biomarkers, is also discussed. EXPERT OPINION: The MeMed BV assay is one of several novel host biomarkers that provide rapid results and demonstrate enhanced performance compared to single test biomarkers. This assay has been validated by a large number of carefully controlled clinical trials that demonstrate improved performance characteristics for distinguishing bacterial infections or combined bacterial/viral infections from viral or noninfectious causes of fever compared to C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. However, these trials may over-state assay performance as samples with equivocal band results are often not included in the statistical analysis. More real-world studies addressing clinical implementation of the MeMed BV assay or other biomarkers into ambulatory settings are needed.