Heterogeneity of Ventilation/Perfusion Mismatch at Different Levels of PEEP and in Respiratory Mechanics Phenotypes of COVID-19 ARDS
Gaetano Scaramuzzo, Dan Stieper Karbing, Alberto Fogagnolo, Tommaso Mauri, Elena Spinelli, Matilde Mari, Cecilia Turrini, Federica Montanaro, Carlo Alberto Volta, Stephen Edward Rees, Savino Spadaro
Abstract
BACKGROUND: COVID-19–related ARDS is characterized by severe hypoxemia with initially preserved lung compliance and impaired ventilation/perfusion (V̇/Q̇) matching. PEEP can increase end-expiratory lung volume, but its effect on V̇/Q̇ mismatch in COVID-19–related ARDS is not clear. METHODS: We enrolled intubated and mechanically ventilated subjects with COVID-19 ARDS and used the automatic lung parameter estimator (ALPE) to measure V̇/Q̇. Respiratory mechanics measurements, shunt, and V̇/Q̇ mismatch (low V̇/Q̇ and high V̇/Q̇) were collected at 3 PEEP levels (clinical PEEP = intermediate PEEP, low PEEP [clinical − 50%], and high PEEP [clinical + 50%]). A mixed-effect model was used to evaluate the impact of PEEP on V̇/Q̇. We also investigated if PEEP might have a different effect on V̇/Q̇ mismatch in 2 different respiratory mechanics phenotypes, that is, high elastance/low compliance (phenotype H) and low elastance/high compliance (phenotype L). RESULTS: Seventeen subjects with COVID-related ARDS age 66 [60–71] y with a P aO 2 /F IO 2 of 141 ± 74 mm Hg were studied at low PEEP = 5.6 ± 2.2 cm H 2 O, intermediate PEEP = 10.6 ± 3.8 cm H 2 O, and high PEEP = 15 ± 5 cm H 2 O. Shunt, low V̇/Q̇, high V̇/Q̇, and alveolar dead space were not significantly influenced, on average, by PEEP. Respiratory system compliance decreased significantly when increasing PEEP without significant variation of P aO 2 /F IO 2 ( P = .26). In the 2 phenotypes, PEEP had opposite effects on shunt, with a decrease in the phenotype L and an increase in phenotype H ( P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with COVID-related ARDS placed on invasive mechanical ventilation for > 48 h, PEEP had a heterogeneous effect on V̇/Q̇ mismatch and, on average, higher levels were not able to reduce shunt. The subject’s compliance could influence the effect of PEEP on V̇/Q̇ mismatch since an increased shunt was observed in subjects with lower compliance, whereas the opposite occurred in those with higher compliance.