Litcius/Paper detail

Melanometry for objective evaluation of skin pigmentation in pulse oximetry studies

Sandhya Vasudevan, William C. Vogt, Sandy Weininger, T. Joshua Pfefer

2024Communications Medicine42 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Pulse oximetry enables real-time, noninvasive monitoring of arterial blood oxygen levels. However, results can vary with skin color, thus detecting disparities during clinical validation studies requires an accurate measure of skin pigmentation. Recent clinical studies have used subjective methods such as self-reported color, race/ethnicity to categorize skin. Melanometers based on optical reflectance may offer a more effective, objective approach to assess pigmentation. Here, we review melanometry approaches and assess evidence supporting their use as clinical research tools. We compare performance data, including repeatability, robustness to confounders, and compare devices to each other, to subjective methods, and high-quality references. Finally, we propose best practices for evaluating melanometers and discuss alternate optical approaches that may improve accuracy. Whilst evidence indicates that melanometers can provide superior performance to subjective approaches, we encourage additional research and standardization efforts, as these are needed to ensure consistent and reliable results in clinical studies.

Topics & Concepts

Pulse oximetrySkin colorRepeatabilityComputer scienceCategorizationRobustness (evolution)MedicineConfoundingMedical physicsArtificial intelligencePathologyStatisticsGeneChemistryAnesthesiaBiochemistryMathematicsThermoregulation and physiological responsesOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Melanometry for objective evaluation of skin pigmentation in pulse oximetry studies | Litcius