Litcius/Paper detail

Imaging-based prostate cancer screening among BRCA mutation carriers—results from the first round of screening

Neil A. Segal, Yaara Ber, Ofer Benjaminov, Shlomit Tamir, Maxim Yakimov, Inbal Kedar, Eli Rosenbaum, Sivan Sela, Rachel Ozalvo, Liat Shavit-Grievink, D. Keder, Jack Baniel, David Margel

2020Annals of Oncology49 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

•We report the first round of a PCa screening study among male BRCA carriers.•We used two novel screening strategies: age-stratified PSA and MRI.•We found a high rate of PCa among BRCA carriers (8.5%). Similar risk of PCa for BRCA1 (8.3%) and BRCA2 (8.7%).•mpMRI based screening missed 1 of the 16 diagnosed cancers (6%), while age-stratified PSA would have missed 5 (31%).•The highest net benefit for screening in young carriers (aged 40–55 years) was MRI; for those aged >55 years it was age-stratified PSA and MRI. BackgroundMale-carriers of BRCA1/2 gene mutations have an increased risk of prostate cancer (PCa) with a more aggressive phenotype. Current screening-guidelines suggest the use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) only among BRCA2 carriers. Female carriers have extensive guidelines that include imaging. Our objective was to test the prevalence of PCa among BRCA carriers and examine screening strategies, using PSA and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI).Patients and methodsWe recruited men aged 40–70 years with BRCA1/2 germline mutations and no prior history of prostate biopsy. All men underwent an initial round of screening which included PSA, and prostate mpMRI. PSA was considered elevated using an age-stratified threshold of ≥1 ng/ml for 40–50 years of age, ≥2 ng/ml for 50–60 years of age, and 2.5 ng/ml for 60–70 years of age. Men with elevated PSA and/or suspicious lesion on mpMRI were offered a prostate biopsy. PSA levels, MRI findings, PCa incidence, and tumor characteristics were evaluated. Decision curve analysis was used to compare screening strategies.ResultsWe recruited 188 men (108 BRCA1, 80 BRCA2), mean age 54 years (9.8). One hundred and ten (57%) had either elevated age-stratified PSA (75; 40%), a suspicious MRI lesion (67; 36%), or both (32; 17%). Of these, 92 (85%) agreed to perform a prostate biopsy. Sixteen (8.5%) were diagnosed with PCa; 44% of the tumors were classified as intermediate- or high-risk disease. mpMRI-based screening missed only one of the cancers (6%), while age-stratified PSA would have missed five (31%). Decision curve analysis showed that mpMRI screening, regardless of PSA, had the highest net benefit for PCa diagnosis, especially among men younger than 55 years of age. We found no difference in the risk of PCa between BRCA1 and BRCA2 (8.3% versus 8.7%, P = 0.91). Ninety percent had a Jewish founder mutation, thus the results cannot be generalized to all ethnic groups.ConclusionsPCa is prevalent among BRCA carriers. Age may affect screening strategy for PCa in this population. Young carriers could benefit from initial MRI screening. BRCA carriers aged older than 55 years should use PSA and be referred to mpMRI if elevated.Trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT02053805. Male-carriers of BRCA1/2 gene mutations have an increased risk of prostate cancer (PCa) with a more aggressive phenotype. Current screening-guidelines suggest the use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) only among BRCA2 carriers. Female carriers have extensive guidelines that include imaging. Our objective was to test the prevalence of PCa among BRCA carriers and examine screening strategies, using PSA and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). We recruited men aged 40–70 years with BRCA1/2 germline mutations and no prior history of prostate biopsy. All men underwent an initial round of screening which included PSA, and prostate mpMRI. PSA was considered elevated using an age-stratified threshold of ≥1 ng/ml for 40–50 years of age, ≥2 ng/ml for 50–60 years of age, and 2.5 ng/ml for 60–70 years of age. Men with elevated PSA and/or suspicious lesion on mpMRI were offered a prostate biopsy. PSA levels, MRI findings, PCa incidence, and tumor characteristics were evaluated. Decision curve analysis was used to compare screening strategies. We recruited 188 men (108 BRCA1, 80 BRCA2), mean age 54 years (9.8). One hundred and ten (57%) had either elevated age-stratified PSA (75; 40%), a suspicious MRI lesion (67; 36%), or both (32; 17%). Of these, 92 (85%) agreed to perform a prostate biopsy. Sixteen (8.5%) were diagnosed with PCa; 44% of the tumors were classified as intermediate- or high-risk disease. mpMRI-based screening missed only one of the cancers (6%), while age-stratified PSA would have missed five (31%). Decision curve analysis showed that mpMRI screening, regardless of PSA, had the highest net benefit for PCa diagnosis, especially among men younger than 55 years of age. We found no difference in the risk of PCa between BRCA1 and BRCA2 (8.3% versus 8.7%, P = 0.91). Ninety percent had a Jewish founder mutation, thus the results cannot be generalized to all ethnic groups. PCa is prevalent among BRCA carriers. Age may affect screening strategy for PCa in this population. Young carriers could benefit from initial MRI screening. BRCA carriers aged older than 55 years should use PSA and be referred to mpMRI if elevated.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineProstate cancerProstateBiopsyProstate cancer screeningProstate-specific antigenProstate biopsyCancerBRCA mutationInternal medicineIncidence (geometry)OncologyGynecologyUrologyBreast cancerOpticsPhysicsProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchBRCA gene mutations in cancer