Evaluation of Nontargeted Mass Spectral Data Acquisition Strategies for Water Analysis and Toxicity-Based Feature Prioritization by MS2Tox
Pilleriin Peets, May Britt Rian, Jonathan W. Martin, Anneli Kruve
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The machine-learning tool MS2Tox can prioritize hazardous nontargeted molecular features in environmental waters, by predicting acute fish lethality of unknown molecules based on their MS 2 spectra, prior to structural annotation. It has yet to be investigated how the extent of molecular coverage, MS 2 spectra quality, and toxicity prediction confidence depend on sample complexity and MS 2 data acquisition strategies. We compared two common nontargeted MS 2 acquisition strategies with liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry for structural annotation accuracy by SIRIUS+CSI:FingerID and MS2Tox toxicity prediction of 191 reference chemicals spiked to LC-MS water, groundwater, surface water, and wastewater. Data-dependent acquisition (DDA) resulted in higher rates (19–62%) of correct structural annotations among reference chemicals in all matrices except wastewaters, compared to data-independent acquisition (DIA, 19–50%). However, DIA resulted in higher MS 2 detection rates (59–84% DIA, 37–82% DDA), leading to higher true positive rates for spectral library matching, 40–73% compared to 34–72%. DDA resulted in higher MS2Tox toxicity prediction accuracy than DIA, with root-mean-square errors of 0.62 and 0.71 log-mM, respectively. Given the importance of MS 2 spectral quality, we introduce a “CombinedConfidence” score to convey relative confidence in MS2Tox predictions and apply this approach to prioritize potentially ecotoxic nontargeted features in environmental waters.