Litcius/Paper detail

Projections and the Potential Societal Impact of the Future of Neurotechnologies

Kate S. Gaudry, Hasan Ayaz, Avery Bedows, Pablo Celnik, David M. Eagleman, Pulkit Grover, Judy Illes, Rajesh P. N. Rao, Jacob T. Robinson, Krishnan Thyagarajan, The Working Group on Brain-Interfacing Devices in 2040

2021Frontiers in Neuroscience21 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Traditionally, recording from and stimulating the brain with high spatial and temporal resolution required invasive means. However, recently, the technical capabilities of less invasive and non-invasive neuro-interfacing technology have been dramatically improving, and laboratories and funders aim to further improve these capabilities. These technologies can facilitate functions such as multi-person communication, mood regulation and memory recall. We consider a potential future where the less invasive technology is in high demand. Will this demand match that the current-day demand for a smartphone? Here, we draw upon existing research to project which particular neuroethics issues may arise in this potential future and what preparatory steps may be taken to address these issues.

Topics & Concepts

NeuroethicsInterfacingComputer scienceMoodRecallNeurosciencePsychologyData scienceCognitive psychologyComputer hardwarePsychiatryNeurological disorders and treatmentsNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces