Litcius/Paper detail

A systematic analysis of regression models for protein engineering

Michaël Richard, Jacob Kæstel‐Hansen, Peter Mørch Groth, Simon Bartels, Jesper Salomon, Pengfei Tian, Nikos S. Hatzakis, Wouter Boomsma

2024PLoS Computational Biology12 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

To optimize proteins for particular traits holds great promise for industrial and pharmaceutical purposes. Machine Learning is increasingly applied in this field to predict properties of proteins, thereby guiding the experimental optimization process. A natural question is: How much progress are we making with such predictions, and how important is the choice of regressor and representation? In this paper, we demonstrate that different assessment criteria for regressor performance can lead to dramatically different conclusions, depending on the choice of metric, and how one defines generalization. We highlight the fundamental issues of sample bias in typical regression scenarios and how this can lead to misleading conclusions about regressor performance. Finally, we make the case for the importance of calibrated uncertainty in this domain.

Topics & Concepts

GeneralizationComputer scienceMetric (unit)Machine learningRegressionRepresentation (politics)Process (computing)Artificial intelligenceField (mathematics)Regression analysisDomain (mathematical analysis)Sample (material)Meta-regressionData miningEconometricsStatisticsMathematicsMeta-analysisEngineeringChromatographyPoliticsPolitical sciencePure mathematicsLawChemistryMedicineOperations managementMathematical analysisInternal medicineOperating systemProtein purification and stabilityProtein Structure and DynamicsViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
A systematic analysis of regression models for protein engineering | Litcius