Litcius/Paper detail

Validation of prediction models in the presence of competing risks: a guide through modern methods

Nan van Geloven, Daniele Giardiello, Edouard F. Bonneville, Lucy Teece, Chava L. Ramspek, Maarten van Smeden, Kym I E Snell, Ben Van Calster, Maja Pohar Perme, Richard D Riley, Hein Putter, Ewout W. Steyerberg

2022BMJ104 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Thorough validation is pivotal for any prediction model before it can be advocated for use in medical practice. For time-to-event outcomes such as breast cancer recurrence, death from other causes is a competing risk. Model performance measures must account for such competing events. In this article, we present a comprehensive yet accessible overview of performance measures for this competing event setting, including the calculation and interpretation of statistical measures for calibration, discrimination, overall prediction error, and clinical usefulness by decision curve analysis. All methods are illustrated for patients with breast cancer, with publicly available data and R code.

Topics & Concepts

Computer scienceEvent (particle physics)Breast cancerInterpretation (philosophy)CalibrationClinical PracticePredictive modellingCode (set theory)Data miningEconometricsMachine learningStatisticsRisk analysis (engineering)CancerMedicineMathematicsInternal medicineSet (abstract data type)Programming languageFamily medicineQuantum mechanicsPhysicsStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Validation of prediction models in the presence of competing risks: a guide through modern methods | Litcius