A comprehensive evaluation of factors affecting nurse leaders’ work-related well-being
Milja Niinihuhta, Anja Terkamo‐Moisio, Tarja Kvist, Arja Häggman‐Laitila
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aims to describe nurse leaders' experiences of work-related well-being and its association with background variables, working conditions, work engagement, sense of coherence and burnout. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: An electronic survey design was used. Data was collected between December 2015 and May 2016 with an instrument that included demographic questions and four internationally validated scales: the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, QPS Nordic 34+, the shortened Sense of Coherence scale and the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Data was analysed using statistical methods. FINDINGS: A total of 155 nurse leaders completed the questionnaire, giving a 44% response rate. Most of them worked as nurse managers (89%). Participants' work-related well-being scores ranged from 8 to 10. Statistically significant relationships were found between participants' work-related well-being and their leadership skills, current position, sense of coherence and levels of burnout. In addition, there were statistically significant relationships between work-related well-being and all dimensions of working conditions. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study underlines the fact that work-related well-being should not be evaluated based on a single factor. The participants' perceived work-related well-being was high, although almost half of them reported always or often experiencing stress. The results suggest that nurse leaders may have resources such as good leadership and problem-solving skills, supportive working conditions and a high sense of coherence that prevent the experienced stress from adversely affecting their work-related well-being.