Life cycle assessment of the climate change impact of magnesium phosphate cements formulated with tundish deskulling waste compared to conventional cement
Anna Alfocea-Roig, Amelie Müller, Bernhard Steubing, Sergio Huete-Hernández, Jessica Giró-Paloma, J. Formosa
Abstract
Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) production significantly contributes to greenhouse gas emissions due to high resource consumption and CO 2 output. It is therefore imperative to investigate alternative cements, such as magnesium phosphate cement (MPC), as a potential solution. This study is based on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology, comparing OPC with alternative magnesium phosphate cements (MPC) developed at the laboratory scale. The novelty of this study considers two types of alternative cements that use two different sources of MgO: MPC-MgO, developed with pure MgO, and MPC-TUN, formulated using tundish deskulling waste from steelmaking industry. The evaluated functional units are 1 tonne of cement, 1 m 3 of cement paste, and 1 m 3 of mortar, all of them are designed for the same function, which is as non-structural precast elements. The study assesses climate change impacts under two future scenarios: 1) electricity decarbonisation in the background economy using projections from Integrated Assessment Models and 2) electricity decarbonisation and a fuel switch in the cement kilns. The results indicate that MPC-TUN exhibits a lower impact of climate change in terms of CO 2 emissions across all functional units and scenarios compared to the other materials. In the most ambitious climate scenario, MPC-TUN mortar exhibits 42% and 56% lower climate change impacts than OPC-CEM I and MPC-MgO mortars, respectively, demonstrating its potential as a more sustainable construction material. Although further research is needed on the applicability of MPC-TUN in construction, regulatory frameworks are advised to simplify barriers to expedite the adoption of sustainable alternative cements. • Prospective LCA enables the analysis of environmental consequences. • The climate change impact of MPC-TUN is lower compared with OPC-CEM I. • Not all cement alternatives exhibit a reduced impact. • Waste incorporation in cement development promotes circular economy.