Litcius/Paper detail

Testing bats in rehabilitation for <scp>SARS‐CoV</scp> ‐2 before release into the wild

Scott Jones, Thomas Bell, Christopher M. Coleman, Danielle Harris, Guy Woodward, Lisa Worledge, Helen Clare Roberts, Lorraine M. McElhinney, James Aegerter, Emma Ransome, Vincent Savolainen

2022Conservation Science and Practice10 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Several studies have suggested SARS-CoV-2 originated from a viral ancestor in bats, but whether transmission occurred directly or via an intermediary host to humans remains unknown. Concerns of spillover of SARS-CoV-2 into wild bat populations are hindering bat rehabilitation and conservation efforts in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. Current protocols state that animals cared for by individuals who have tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 cannot be released into the wild and must be isolated to reduce the risk of transmission to wild populations. Here, we propose a reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)-based protocol for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in bats, using fecal sampling. Bats from the United Kingdom were tested following suspected exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and tested negative for the virus. With current UK and international legislation, the identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection in wild animals is becoming increasingly important, and protocols such as the one developed here will help improve understanding and mitigation of SARS-CoV-2 in the future.

Topics & Concepts

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Transmission (telecommunications)BiologyVirologyBetacoronavirusCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicineDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)EngineeringPathologyElectrical engineeringSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies