Litcius/Paper detail

Avoiding wasted research resources in conservation science

Rachel T. Buxton, Elizabeth A. Nyboer, Karine E. Pigeon, Graham D. Raby, Trina Rytwinski, Austin J. Gallagher, Richard Schuster, Hsien‐Yung Lin, Lenore Fahrig, Joseph Bennett, Steven J. Cooke, Dominique G. Roche

2021Conservation Science and Practice66 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Scientific evidence is fundamental for guiding effective conservation action to curb biodiversity loss. Yet, research resources in conservation are often wasted due to biased allocation of research effort, irrelevant or low‐priority questions, flawed studies, inaccessible research outputs, and biased or poor‐quality reporting. We outline a striking example of wasted research resources, highlight a powerful case of data rescue/reuse, and discuss an exemplary model of evidence‐informed conservation. We suggest that funding agencies, research institutions, NGOs, publishers, and researchers are part of the problem and solutions, and outline recommendations to curb the waste of research resources, including knowledge co‐creation and open science practices.

Topics & Concepts

ReuseConservation scienceQuality (philosophy)Biodiversity conservationBusinessOpen scienceAction (physics)Management sciencePublic relationsPolitical scienceEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementKnowledge managementComputer scienceBiodiversityEconomicsEngineeringGeographyEcologyPhysicsWaste managementQuantum mechanicsEpistemologyBiologyAstronomyPhilosophySpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeResearch Data Management PracticesEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies