Litcius/Paper detail

The Role of the Inflammatory Prognostic Index in Patients with Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Ersan Oflar, Muhsin Kalyoncuoğlu, A. Koyuncu, Cennet Yıldız, Hasan Ali Sinoplu, Fahrettin Katkat, Gündüz Durmuş

2025Journal of Clinical Medicine10 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the prognostic role of the inflammatory prognostic index (IPI) value at admission in major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in individuals with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: A total of 1142 NSTEMI patients with a mean age of 61.9 ± 12.5 years were included. Admission C-reactive protein level, serum albumin level, and complete blood counts of participants were collected from hospital records. The IPI was calculated based on the following formula: C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) x neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). An aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) value was calculated using the ‘‘neutrophil count x monocyte count x platelet/lymphocyte count’’ formula. The study cohort was divided into two groups according to the median IPI value. Results: Patients with higher IPI values were statistically more likely to suffer from MACCEs within one year (p < 0.001), thus the admission IPI value was found to be associated with future development of MACCEs. Furthermore, it had sufficient discrimination power (AUC = 0.70) and predictive accuracy in identifying MACCEs compared to other inflammatory parameters such as the CAR (AUC = 0.64), the NLR (AUC = 0.64), and the AISI (AUC = 0.59). Adding the IPI to the baseline multivariable logistic regression model significantly improved the model’s discrimination and net clinical benefit effect for identifying patients who would suffer from MACCEs, with a C-index of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.82–0.86) and explanatory power of 23.2% (R2 = 0.232, DeLong test p = 0.001). High-risk patients with an IPI value greater than 2.43 had significantly more adverse events (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The IPI may be a promising inflammatory index for use in clinical practice to determine the risk prediction of MACCEs in NSTEMI patients undergoing PCI.

Topics & Concepts

MedicinePercutaneous coronary interventionInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionConventional PCINeutrophil to lymphocyte ratioC-reactive proteinCardiologyAcute coronary syndromeLymphocyteInflammationInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease PrognosisVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
The Role of the Inflammatory Prognostic Index in Patients with Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention | Litcius