Are future recycling benefits misleading? Prospective life cycle assessment of lithium‐ion batteries
Joris Šimaitis, Stephen Allen, Christopher Vagg
Abstract
Abstract Life cycle assessment (LCA) quantifies the whole‐life environmental impacts of products and is essential for helping policymakers and manufacturers transition toward sustainable practices. However, typical LCA estimates future recycling benefits as if it happens today. For long‐lived products such as lithium‐ion batteries, this may be misleading since there is a considerable time gap between production and recycling. To explore this temporal mismatch problem, we apply future electricity scenarios from an integrated assessment model—IMAGE—using “premise” in Brightway2 to conduct a prospective LCA (pLCA) on the global warming potential of six battery chemistries and four recycling routes. We find that by 2050, electricity decarbonization under an RCP2.6 scenario mitigates production impacts by 57%, so to reach zero‐carbon batteries it is important to decarbonize upstream heat, fuels, and direct emissions. For the best battery recycling case, data for 2020 gives a net recycling benefit of −22 kg CO 2 e kWh −1 which reduces the net impact of production and recycling from 71 to 49 kg CO 2 e kWh −1 . However, for recycling in 2040 with decarbonized electricity, net recycling benefits would be nearly 75% lower (−6 kg CO 2 e kWh −1 ), giving a net impact of 65 kg CO 2 e kWh −1 . This is because materials recycled in the future substitute lower‐impact processes due to expected electricity decarbonization. Hence, more focus should be placed on mitigating production impacts today instead of relying on future recycling. These findings demonstrate the importance of pLCA in tackling problems such as temporal mismatch that are difficult to capture in typical LCA.