Litcius/Paper detail

Moral Decision-Making During COVID-19: Moral Judgements, Moralisation, and Everyday Behaviour

Kathryn Francis, Carolyn McNabb

2022Frontiers in Psychology36 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose significant health, economic, and social challenges. Given that many of these challenges have moral relevance, the present studies investigate whether the COVID-19 pandemic is influencing moral decision-making and whether moralisation of behaviours specific to the crisis predict adherence to government-recommended behaviours. Whilst we find no evidence that utilitarian endorsements have changed during the pandemic at two separate timepoints, individuals have moralised non-compliant behaviours associated with the pandemic such as failing to physically distance themselves from others. Importantly, our findings show that this moralisation predicts sustained individual compliance with government-recommended behaviours.

Topics & Concepts

PandemicPsychologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Government (linguistics)Relevance (law)Compliance (psychology)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSocial psychologySevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Political scienceMedicineLawDiseasePhilosophyPathologyVirologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)LinguisticsOutbreakPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentSocial and Intergroup PsychologyCultural Differences and Values
Moral Decision-Making During COVID-19: Moral Judgements, Moralisation, and Everyday Behaviour | Litcius