Litcius/Paper detail

Diagnostic accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in differentiating malignant from benign solid liver lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Farhad Nalaini, Fatemeh Shahbazi, Seyedeh Maryam Mousavinezhad, Ali Ansari, Mohammadgharib Salehi

2021British Journal of Radiology26 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Objectives: We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values derived by diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI in the characterization of solid benign and malignant liver lesions, and to assess their value in discriminating these lesions in daily routine practice. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted to retrieve studies that used ADC values for differentiating solid benign/dysplastic nodules and malignant liver lesions. A bivariate random-effects model with pooled sensitivity and specificity values with 95% CI (confidence interval) was used. This meta-analysis was performed on the per-lesion basis. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) plot and area under curve (AUC) were created. Results: A total of 14 original articles were retrieved. The combined (95% CI) sensitivity and specificity of mean ADC values for differentiating solid benign from malignant lesions were 78% (67–86%) and 74% (64–81%), respectively. The pooled (95% CI) positive and negative LRs were respectively 3 (2.3–3.8) and 0.3 (0.21–0.43). The DOR (95% CI) was 10 (7–15). The AUC (95% CI) of the SROC plot was 82% (78–85%). Reporting bias was negligible (p value of regression test = 0.36). Mean size of malignant lesions and breathing pattern of MRI were found to be sources of heterogeneity of pooled sensitivity. Conclusion: ADC measurement independently may not be an optimal diagnostic imaging method for differentiating solid malignant from solid benign hepatic lesions. The meta-analysis showed that ADC measurement had moderate diagnostic accuracy for characterizing solid liver lesions. Further prospective and comparative studies with pre-specified ADC thresholds could be performed to investigate the best MRI protocol and ADC threshold for characterizing solid liver lesions. Advances in knowledge: ADC measurement by DW-MRI does not have a good diagnostic performance to differentiate solid malignant from solid benign lesions. Therefore, we suggest not using ADC values in clinical practice to evaluate solid liver lesions.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineEffective diffusion coefficientReceiver operating characteristicMeta-analysisConfidence intervalNuclear medicineArea under the curveDiagnostic odds ratioDiffusion MRIRadiologyPathologyMagnetic resonance imagingInternal medicineMRI in cancer diagnosisHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging