Litcius/Paper detail

Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Condylar Hypoplasia and Facial Asymmetry in Craniofacial Microsomia Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Yun-Fang Chen, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam, Stefaan Bergé, Yu‐Fang Liao, Thomas Maal, Tong Xi

2021Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery18 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

PurposeTo assess the condylar hypoplasia and its correlation with craniofacial deformities in adults with unilateral craniofacial microsomia (CFM).MethodsPretreatment cone-beam computed tomography scans of consecutive adults (mean age: 20.4 ± 3.0 years; range: 17.3 to 31.4 years) with Pruzansky-Kaban type I and IIA CFM were reconstructed in 3D. Both condyles were segmented. Asymmetry ratios (affected side/contralateral side) of condylar volume were calculated to indicate the extent of condylar hypoplasia. 3D cephalometry was performed to quantify the maxillomandibular morphology and facial asymmetry. The correlations in between were assessed by using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficients.ResultsThirty-six subjects were enrolled, consisting of 22 subjects with Pruzansky-Kaban type I and 14 subjects with type IIA. The condyles in type IIA group were significantly more hypoplastic in height (asymmetry ratio: 40.69 vs 59.95%, P = .006) and volume (18.16 vs 47.84%, P < .001) compared to type I group. Type IIA group had a significantly smaller SNB value than type I group (72.94° vs 77.41°, P = .012), and a significantly greater facial asymmetry (P < .05). The hypoplastic extent of condylar volume and Pruzansky-Kaban types were significantly correlated with SNB (r = 0.457 and ρ = -0.411, respectively), upper incisor deviation (r = -0.446 and ρ = 0.362), chin deviation (r = -0.477 and ρ = 0.527), upper occlusal plane cant (r = -0.672 and ρ = 0.631), and mandibular plane cant (r = -0.557 and ρ = 0.357, P < .05).ConclusionFor unilateral CFM adults, greater condylar hypoplasia in volume along with more severe mandibular retrusion and facial asymmetry objectively indicated a higher scale of Pruzansky-Kaban classification (type IIA). These quantitative distinctions are expected to enhance the diagnostic reliability of CFM. To assess the condylar hypoplasia and its correlation with craniofacial deformities in adults with unilateral craniofacial microsomia (CFM). Pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography scans of consecutive adults (mean age: 20.4 ± 3.0 years; range: 17.3 to 31.4 years) with Pruzansky-Kaban type I and IIA CFM were reconstructed in 3D. Both condyles were segmented. Asymmetry ratios (affected side/contralateral side) of condylar volume were calculated to indicate the extent of condylar hypoplasia. 3D cephalometry was performed to quantify the maxillomandibular morphology and facial asymmetry. The correlations in between were assessed by using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficients. Thirty-six subjects were enrolled, consisting of 22 subjects with Pruzansky-Kaban type I and 14 subjects with type IIA. The condyles in type IIA group were significantly more hypoplastic in height (asymmetry ratio: 40.69 vs 59.95%, P = .006) and volume (18.16 vs 47.84%, P < .001) compared to type I group. Type IIA group had a significantly smaller SNB value than type I group (72.94° vs 77.41°, P = .012), and a significantly greater facial asymmetry (P < .05). The hypoplastic extent of condylar volume and Pruzansky-Kaban types were significantly correlated with SNB (r = 0.457 and ρ = -0.411, respectively), upper incisor deviation (r = -0.446 and ρ = 0.362), chin deviation (r = -0.477 and ρ = 0.527), upper occlusal plane cant (r = -0.672 and ρ = 0.631), and mandibular plane cant (r = -0.557 and ρ = 0.357, P < .05). For unilateral CFM adults, greater condylar hypoplasia in volume along with more severe mandibular retrusion and facial asymmetry objectively indicated a higher scale of Pruzansky-Kaban classification (type IIA). These quantitative distinctions are expected to enhance the diagnostic reliability of CFM.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineCondyleHemifacial microsomiaHypoplasiaCone beam computed tomographyFacial symmetryCraniofacialOrthodonticsComputed tomographyTomographyAnatomyRadiologyPsychiatryCraniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsTemporomandibular Joint DisordersOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics