Transurethral resection of the prostate in 85+ patients: a retrospective, multicentre study
Michael Lotterstätter, Stephan Seklehner, Florian Wimpissinger, Jozsef Gombos, Jasmin Bektić, Philipp Stolzlechner, Sarah Laimer, Thomas Herrmann, Stephan Madersbacher, Lukas Lusuardi, Manuela Sieberer, Christian Ramesmayer
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) in patients 85 years or older. METHODS: In this retrospective, multicentre study, patients equal or older than 85 years at the time of surgery (2015-2020) were included. Several pre-, peri- and postoperative parameters were collected. The main outcome criterion was spontaneous voiding with a post-void residual (PVR) volume < 100 ml at dismission and at 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight patients (median age: 87 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 86-89) were recruited. The patients took on average 5.2 permanent medications (3-8), 107 (64%) were anticoagulated preoperatively and neurological co-morbidities were present in 29 (17%). The indication for surgery was recurrent urinary retention in 66.3% (n = 110) with a mean retention volume of 849 ml. The mean PVR volume of the remaining 35% was 146 ml. Surgery was successfully completed in all patients. A perioperative surgical revision had to be performed in 3% and 13 patients (7.7%) required blood transfusion. After catheter removal, 85% of patients were able to void spontaneously with a PVR < 100 ml, and 14.3% were dismissed with a catheter. Twelve months data were available for 93 patients (55%). Of this cohort, 78 (83.9%) were able to void spontaneously with a PVR < 100 ml, 12 (12.9%) were on permanent catheterization. One patient (0.6%) died perioperatively. The only significant factor associated with an unsuccessful outcome was the number of permanent medications (6.8 vs. 5.0, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: This retrospective multicentre study documents the safety and efficacy of TURP (monopolar and bipolar) in the old-old cohort.