The loss or absence of minimal residual disease of <0·1% at any time after two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy in <i>CBFB–MYH11</i>‐positive acute myeloid leukaemia indicates poor prognosis
Wenbing Duan, Xiaohong Liu, Jinsong Jia, Jing Wang, Lizhong Gong, Qian Jiang, Ting Zhao, Yu Wang, Xiaohui Zhang, Lan‐Ping Xu, Xiaosu Zhao, Ya‐Zhen Qin, Hongxia Shi, Ying‐Jun Chang, Xiao‐Jun Huang, Hao Jiang
Abstract
No consensus has been reached on the relationship between CBFB-MYH11 copies and prognosis. Of 1525 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, 58 with CBFB-MYH11-positive AML (16/58 patients with c-kit mutation) were retrospectively analyzed with a median follow-up duration of 29.8 (range: 4.8-74.4) months. Of these, 25/58 (43.1%) patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), 10 of whom had the c-kit mutation. Of the 33 patients who did not undergo allo-HSCT, recurrence in patients with CBFB-MYH11/ABL level >0.1% at any time after two consolidation cycles was significantly higher than in patients with CBFB-MYH11/ABL level <0.1% (61.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.001); further, the 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS; 31.4% vs. 100%, P = 0.004) and event-free survival (EFS; 33.1% vs. 100%, P = 0.004) were significantly decreased in patients with CBFB-MYH11/ABL level >0.1% at any time after two consolidation cycles. The 3-year RFS and EFS rates were lower in patients who did not receive allo-HSCT than in those who did (31.4% vs 84.6%, P = 0.000; 31.4% vs. 80.8%, P = 0.001). CBFB-MYH11-positive AML patients with CBFB-MYH11/ABL level >0.1% at any time after two cycles of consolidation had poor prognoses, and allo-HSCT could improve their survival.