Litcius/Paper detail

Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Fault Detection and Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Benchmark on the Tennessee Eastman Process

Vitaliy Pozdnyakov, Aleksandr Kovalenko, Ilya Makarov, Mikhail Drobyshevskiy, Kirill Lukyanov

2024IEEE Open Journal of the Industrial Electronics Society19 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Integrating machine learning into Automated Control Systems (ACS) enhances decision-making in industrial process management. One of the limitations to the widespread adoption of these technologies in industry is the vulnerability of neural networks to adversarial attacks. This study explores the threats in deploying deep learning models for Fault Detection and Diagnosis (FDD) in ACS using the Tennessee Eastman Process dataset. By evaluating three neural networks with different architectures, we subject them to six types of adversarial attacks and explore five different defense methods. Our results highlight the strong vulnerability of models to adversarial samples and the varying effectiveness of defense strategies. We also propose a new defense strategy based on combining adversarial training and data quantization. This research contributes several insights into securing machine learning within ACS, ensuring robust FDD in industrial processes.

Topics & Concepts

Adversarial systemVulnerability (computing)Benchmark (surveying)Process (computing)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learningArtificial neural networkDeep learningAdversarial machine learningVulnerability assessmentFault (geology)Deep neural networksComputer securityRisk analysis (engineering)BusinessPsychologyGeologyOperating systemSeismologyGeodesyGeographyPsychological resiliencePsychotherapistAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningBacillus and Francisella bacterial research
Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Fault Detection and Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Benchmark on the Tennessee Eastman Process | Litcius