Litcius/Paper detail

Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on coronary revascularization and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis

Monica Dinu, Francesco Sofi, Sofia Lotti, Barbara Colombini, Anna Vittoria Mattioli, Alberico L. Catapano, Manuela Casula, Andrea Baragetti, Nathan D. Wong, Philippe Gabríel Steg, Giuseppe Ambrosio

2024European Journal of Preventive Cardiology15 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

AIMS: Benefits of pharmacologic omega-3 fatty acid administration in cardiovascular prevention are controversial. Particularly, effects on coronary revascularization are unclear; also debated are specific benefits of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). We investigated incident coronary revascularizations, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure (HF), unstable angina, and cardiovascular death, in subjects randomized to receive EPA or EPA + docosahexaenoic acid (EPA + DHA) vs. control. METHODS AND RESULTS: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted after MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library search. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines were followed for abstracting data and assessing data quality and validity. Data were pooled using a random effects model. Eighteen RCTs with 134 144 participants (primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention) receiving DHA + EPA (n = 52 498), EPA alone (n = 14 640), or control/placebo (n = 67 006) were included. Follow-up ranged from 4.5 months to 7.4 years. Overall, compared with controls, omega-3 supplementation reduced the risk of revascularization [0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.98; P = 0.001; P-heterogeneity = 0.0002; I2 = 68%], MI (0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.98; P = 0.02; P-heterogeneity = 0.06; I2 = 41%), and cardiovascular death (0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.99; P = 0.02; P-heterogeneity = 0.13; I2 = 33%). Lower risk was still observed in trials where most participants (≥60%) were on statin therapy. Compared with DHA + EPA, EPA alone showed a further significant risk reduction of revascularizations (0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.88; P = 0.0002; P-interaction = 0.005) and all outcomes except HF. CONCLUSION: Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation reduced the risk of cardiovascular events and coronary revascularization, regardless of background statin use. Eicosapentaenoic acid alone produced greater benefits. The role of specific omega-3 molecules in primary vs. secondary prevention and the potential benefits of reduced revascularizations on overall health status and cost savings warrant further research.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineEicosapentaenoic acidInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionRandomized controlled trialMeta-analysisAnginaDocosahexaenoic acidCochrane LibraryConfidence intervalPlaceboOmega 3 fatty acidStroke (engine)CardiologyFatty acidPolyunsaturated fatty acidPathologyMechanical engineeringOrganic chemistryEngineeringAlternative medicineChemistryFatty Acid Research and HealthLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthEicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology