Litcius/Paper detail

Soil Moisture Prediction Using Remote Sensing and Machine Learning Algorithms: A Review on Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities

Manoj Lamichhane, Sushant Mehan, Kyle R. Douglas‐Mankin

2025Remote Sensing40 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) has gained significant attention for unraveling the complex, nonlinear relationships between soil moisture (SM) and various predictive variables, including remote sensing (RS; reflectance, brightness temperature, backscatter coefficients) and biophysical (topographic, soil, vegetation, and weather) variables. We reviewed the literature to extract and synthesize ML algorithms, reliable input features, and challenges in SM estimation using RS data. We analyzed results from 144 articles published from 2010 to 2024. Random forest (40 out of 67 studies), support vector regressor (13 out of 39 studies), and artificial neural networks (12 out of 27 studies) often outperformed other algorithms to estimate SM using RS datasets. Multi-source RS data often outperformed single-source data in SM estimation. Satellite-derived features, such as vegetation indices and backscattering coefficients, provided critical information on surface SM (SSM) variability to estimate SSM. For root zone SM estimation, soil properties and SSM generally were more reliable predictors than surface information derived solely from RS. Two recent advances—the use of semi-empirical models and L-band SAR to mitigate vegetation effects, and transfer learning to improve model transferability—have shown promise in addressing key challenges in SM estimation.

Topics & Concepts

TransferabilityRandom forestSupport vector machineWater contentRemote sensingBackscatter (email)Environmental scienceVegetation (pathology)Machine learningAlgorithmComputer scienceArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceGeologyMedicineGeotechnical engineeringTelecommunicationsWirelessPathologyLogitSoil Moisture and Remote SensingSoil Geostatistics and MappingSoil and Unsaturated Flow