Litcius/Paper detail

False Discovery in A/B Testing

Ron Berman, Christophe Van den Bulte

2021Management Science27 citationsDOI

Abstract

We investigate what fraction of all significant results in website A/B testing is actually null effects (i.e., the false discovery rate (FDR)). Our data consist of 4,964 effects from 2,766 experiments conducted on a commercial A/B testing platform. Using three different methods, we find that the FDR ranges between 28% and 37% for tests conducted at 10% significance and between 18% and 25% for tests at 5% significance (two sided). These high FDRs stem mostly from the high fraction of true null effects, about 70%, rather than from low power. Using our estimates, we also assess the potential of various A/B test designs to reduce the FDR. The two main implications are that decision makers should expect one in five interventions achieving significance at 5% confidence to be ineffective when deployed in the field and that analysts should consider using two-stage designs with multiple variations rather than basic A/B tests. This paper was accepted by Eric Anderson, marketing.

Topics & Concepts

False discovery rateNull hypothesisMultiple comparisons problemNull (SQL)Statistical hypothesis testingStatisticsStatistical powerFraction (chemistry)EconometricsComputer scienceField (mathematics)MathematicsData miningGenePure mathematicsOrganic chemistryChemistryBiochemistryStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews
False Discovery in A/B Testing | Litcius