Litcius/Paper detail

Partnering to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening: Perspectives of Community Advisory Board Members

Susan M. Rawl, Sandra L. Bailey, Beatrice Cork, Matthew Fields, Thomas W. Griffin, Laura Haunert, Judy Kline, Connie Krier, Juan Lagunes, Ruth L. Lambert, Caeli Malloy, Jack Quick, Rivienne Shedd‐Steele, Sylvia Strom, Lisa Carter‐Harris

2021Western Journal of Nursing Research14 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) defines engagement in research as the meaningful involvement of patients, caregivers, clinicians, insurers, and others throughout the entire research process-from planning to conducting the study to disseminating study results. The purposes of this paper are to (a) describe methods used to engage community members across the various phases of a PCORI-funded comparative effectiveness trial to increase colorectal cancer screening; and (b) report results of qualitative and quantitative evaluations of community advisory board members' experiences on this project. Decisions to join and stay engaged with the study included feeling valued and appreciated, being compensated, the opportunity to contribute to research based on their skills and expertise, and being committed to colon cancer prevention efforts. Challenges identified by advisory board members included the significant time commitment, transportation, and meeting location. Lessons learned and guidance for researchers committed to patient and community engagement are described.

Topics & Concepts

Colorectal cancerColorectal cancer screeningMedicineAdvisory committeeFamily medicineCancerInternal medicinePolitical scienceColonoscopyPublic administrationColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionHealth Policy Implementation SciencePrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Partnering to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening: Perspectives of Community Advisory Board Members | Litcius