Litcius/Paper detail

Comparative effectiveness of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training on cardiometabolic health in patients with diabesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Sameer Badri Al-Mhanna, Eric Tsz‐Chun Poon, Barry A. Franklin, Mark A. Tarnopolsky, John A. Hawley, John M. Jakicic, Emmanuel Stamatakis, Jonathan P. Little, Linda S. Pescatello, Deborah Riebe, W. R. Thompson, James S. Skinner, Sheri R. Colberg, Jonathan K. Ehrman, George S. Metsios, Helen Douda, Norsuhana Omar, Abdullah F. Alghannam, Alexios Batrakoulis

2025Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome22 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on cardiometabolic health-related outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and concurrent overweight/obesity (diabesity). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception up to January 31, 2025. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: RCTs comparing HIIT alone ≥ 2 weeks in duration with moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). Participants were adults with diabesity. RESULTS: ). HIIT revealed a significant reduction in fasting insulin [standardized mean differences (SMD) - 0.43, 95% CI - 0.82 to - 0.05] and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; SMD - 0.52, 95% CI - 0.97 to - 0.07) compared to MICT. Additionally, HIIT significantly increased cardiorespiratory fitness (VO₂max; SMD 0.53, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.91) compared to MICT. Other clinically relevant cardiometabolic outcomes, including body composition, lipid profile, fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and blood pressure, showed comparable changes between HIIT and MICT. Subgroup analyses of studies reporting comorbidities indicated a significant increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (SMD 0.49, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.95) and a decrease in HOMA-IR (SMD - 0.83, 95% CI - 1.62 to - 0.04) for HIIT compared to MICT. However, these findings are limited by very low certainty evidence and non-robust sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that HIIT may serve as an adjunctive non-pharmaceutical management solution for patients with diabesity. Open Science Framework registry: https://osf.io/9by24.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineHigh-intensity interval trainingGlycated hemoglobinInternal medicineInterval trainingCardiorespiratory fitnessCochrane LibraryInsulin resistanceOverweightRandomized controlled trialMeta-analysisConfidence intervalLipid profilePhysical therapyObesityType 2 diabetesDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyCholesterolCardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Comparative effectiveness of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training on cardiometabolic health in patients with diabesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials | Litcius