Validity and Absolute Reliability of the Cobb Angle in Idiopathic Scoliosis with TraumaMeter Software
José Hurtado-Avilés, Fernando Santonja‐Medina, Vicente J. León‐Muñoz, Pilar Sáinz de Baranda, Mónica Collazo-Diéguez, Mercedes Cabañero-Castillo, Ana Belén Ponce-Garrido, Victoria Eugenia Fuentes-Santos, Fernando Santonja-Renedo, Miriam González-Ballester, Francisco Javier Sánchez-Martínez, Pietro G. Fiorita, José Manuel Sanz-Mengíbar, Joaquín Alcaraz-Belzunces, Vicente Ferrer-López, Pilar Andújar-Ortuño
Abstract
The Cobb angle value is a critical parameter for evaluating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. This study aimed to evaluate a software’s validity and absolute reliability to determine the Cobb angle in AIS digital X-rays, with two different degrees of experienced observers. Four experts and four novice evaluators measured 35 scoliotic curves with the software on three separate occasions, one month apart. The observers re-measured the same radiographic studies on three separate occasions three months later but on conventional X-ray films. The differences between the mean bias errors (MBE) within the experience groups were statistically significant between the experts (software) and novices (manual) (p < 0.001) and between the novices (software) and novices (manual) (p = 0.005). When measured with the software, the intra-group error in the expert group was MBE = 1.71 ± 0.61° and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC (2,1)) = 0.986, and in the novice group, MBE = 1.9 ± 0.67° and ICC (2,1) = 0.97. There was almost a perfect concordance among the two measurement methods, ICC (2,1) = 0.998 and minimum detectable change (MCD95) < 0.4°. Control of the intrinsic error sources enabled obtaining inter- and intra-observer MDC95 < 0.5° in the two experience groups and with the two measurement methods. The computer-aided software TraumaMeter increases the validity and reliability of Cobb angle measurements concerning manual measurement.