Papillary renal cell carcinoma: a single institutional study of 199 cases addressing classification, clinicopathologic and molecular features, and treatment outcome
Paari Murugan, Liwei Jia, Renzo G. DiNatale, Melissa Assel, Nicole Benfante, Hikmat Al‐Ahmadie, Samson W. Fine, Anuradha Gopalan, Judy Sarungbam, S. Joseph Sirintrapun, A. Ari Hakimi, Paul Russo, Ying‐Bei Chen, Satish K. Tickoo, Victor E. Reuter
Abstract
The morphologic spectrum of type 1 papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is not well-defined, since a significant proportion of cases have mixed type 1 and 2 histology. We analyzed 199 cases of PRCC with any (even if focal) type 1 features, with a median follow-up of 12 years, to identify clinicopathological features associated with outcome. Ninety-five tumors (48%) of the cohort contained some type 2 component (median amount: 25%; IQR: 10%, 70%). As a group they showed high rates of progression-free (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Tumor size, mitotic rate, lymphovascular invasion, sarcomatoid differentiation, sheet-like architecture, and lack of tumor circumscription were significantly associated with CSS (p ≤ 0.015) on univariate analysis. While predominant WHO/ISUP nucleolar grade was associated with PFS (p = 0.013) and CSS (p = 0.030), the presence of non-predominant (<50%) nucleolar grade did not show association with outcome (p = 0.7). PFS and CSS showed no significant association with the presence or the amount of type 2 morphology. We compared the molecular alterations in paired type 1 and type 2 areas in a subset of 22 cases with mixed type 1 and 2 features and identified 12 recurrently mutated genes including TERT, ARID1A, KDM6A, KMT2D, NFE2L2, MET, APC, and TP53. Among 78 detected somatic mutations, 61 (78%) were shared between the paired type 1 and type 2 areas. Copy number alterations, including chromosome 7 and 17 gains, were similar between type 1 and 2 areas. These findings support that type 2 features in a PRCC with mixed histology represent either morphologic variance or clonal evolution. Our study underscores the notion that PRCC with any classic type 1 regions is best considered as type 1 PRCC and assigned the appropriate WHO/ISUP nucleolar grade. It provides additional evidence that type 2 PRCC as a separate category should be re-assessed and likely needs to be abandoned.