Litcius/Paper detail

Ru–CeO<sub>2</sub> Nanocatalysts with Weak Metal–Support Interactions for Ethylene Methoxycarbonylation

Jiabing Chen, Yibo Tang, Xingmao Jiang, Rui Zhang, Xiaojun Lu

2024ACS Applied Nano Materials10 citationsDOI

Abstract

In this work, Ru–CeO 2 prepared by a “melting” method and used as a heterogeneous catalyst for ethylene methoxycarbonylation was investigated, together with two other catalysts prepared by impregnation and aerosol methods. The Ru–CeO 2 (1%-M) catalyst demonstrates activity significantly higher than that of the other catalysts with the same Ru content. The XPS and Raman analysis results suggest that the Ru–CeO 2 (1%-M) oxygen vacancy content is not the highest among the catalysts prepared using the three methods, even though the content oxygen vacancies have been reported to play a crucial role in carbonylation when using a Ru–CeO 2 catalyst. It was discovered that the available Ru 0 (Ru 0 in the freshly prepared sample plus that being transformed from Ru n + during reduction) is the other decisive factor in determining the catalyst’s performance. We further investigated the high reducibility of the catalyst prepared by using the melting method and discovered that a weak metal–support interaction could be obtained because of the independent formations of Ru and CeO 2 crystals with graphite carbon as the barrier. Removing carbon under the optimal conditions could facilitate the as-formed Ru crystals anchored onto CeO 2; therefore, there is no strong interaction between Ru and CeO 2 .

Topics & Concepts

Nanomaterial-based catalystEthyleneMetalChemistryMaterials scienceCatalysisOrganic chemistryCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceCatalysis and Oxidation ReactionsCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
Ru–CeO<sub>2</sub> Nanocatalysts with Weak Metal–Support Interactions for Ethylene Methoxycarbonylation | Litcius