ENERGIZE-T: A Global, Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Mitapivat in Adults with Transfusion-Dependent Alpha- or Beta-Thalassemia
Maria Domenica Cappellini, Sujit Sheth, Alì Taher, Hanny Al‐Samkari, Bülent Antmen, David Benéitez, Giovanna Cannas, Thomas D. Coates, Lauren Czapla, Jayme L. Dahlin, Jeremie H. Estepp, Elizabeth Feenstra, Pencho Georgiev, Sarah Gheuens, Keely Gilroy, Andreas Glenthøj, Khaled M. Musallam, Kareem Osman, John B. Porter, Hui Shao, Katrin Uhlig, Eduard J. van Beers, Vip Viprakasit, Kevin H.M. Kuo, Antonis Kattamis
Abstract
Introduction: Transfusions and iron chelators have improved survival and outcomes in transfusion-dependent (TD)-thalassemia. However, they are associated with adverse effects, such as end organ complications and high healthcare resource utilization, and can become a burden for patients (pts), limiting adherence and negatively impacting quality of life. These limitations highlight a need for new agents targeting disease pathophysiology. There are no approved oral disease-modifying therapies for β-thalassemia, and no therapies are approved for α-thalassemia. Mitapivat is a first-in-class, oral, allosteric activator of pyruvate kinase that increases adenosine triphosphate production, which may improve thalassemic red blood cell (RBC) health by addressing their increased cellular energy demands. In a phase 3 trial in non-transfusion-dependent (NTD)-α- or β-thalassemia (ENERGIZE [NCT04770753]), mitapivat significantly improved hemoglobin levels and fatigue vs placebo. Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of mitapivat vs placebo in adults with TD-α- or β-thalassemia in ENERGIZE-T (NCT04770779). Methods: Adults (≥18 years) with TD-α- or β-thalassemia from 19 countries were randomized 2:1 to mitapivat 100 mg or placebo twice daily for 48 weeks. TD was defined as 6-20 RBC units transfused and a ≤6-week transfusion-free period during the 24-week period before randomization. Randomization was stratified by thalassemia genotype (β0/β0 and non-β0/β0, including HbE/β-thalassemia and α-thalassemia/HbH) and geographic region. The primary endpoint was transfusion reduction response (TRR, a ≥50% reduction in transfused RBC units and a reduction of ≥2 units of transfused RBCs in any consecutive 12-week period through Week 48 compared with baseline [BL]). Key secondary endpoints were: TRR2, a ≥50% reduction from BL in transfused RBC units in any consecutive 24-week period through Week 48; TRR3, a ≥33% reduction from BL in transfused RBC units in Weeks 13-48; and TRR4, a ≥50% reduction from BL in transfused RBC units in Weeks 13-48. Transfusion independence (TI, transfusion-free for ≥8 consecutive weeks through Week 48) and safety were among the secondary endpoints. Results: A total of 258 pts were randomized (mitapivat: N=171; placebo: N=87); 155 (90.6%) and 83 (95.4%) pts in the mitapivat and placebo arms, respectively, completed the 48-week double-blind period. Overall, mean age was 35.5 years; 70.9% of pts had a 24-week BL transfusion burden of >12 RBC units; and 44.2% had β0/β0 genotype. There was no imbalance in BL characteristics between treatment arms deemed to impact the interpretation of the results. A TRR was achieved in 30.4% of pts in the mitapivat arm vs 12.6% in the placebo arm (2-sided p=0.0003). Statistically significant reductions in transfusion burden for mitapivat vs placebo were also demonstrated by all key secondary endpoints: 13.5% vs 2.3% (2-sided p=0.0003) achieved TRR2; 14.6% vs 1.1% (2-sided p<0.0001) achieved TRR3; and 7.6% vs 1.1% (2-sided p=0.0056) achieved TRR4. Overall results for these endpoints were not driven by any of the individual prespecified subgroups, including genotype and BL transfusion burden. A higher proportion of pts in the mitapivat arm achieved TI (9.9%) vs the placebo arm (1.1%). The proportion of pts with any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar across treatment arms (mitapivat: 90.1%; placebo: 83.5%). TEAEs occurring in ≥10% of pts on mitapivat were headache, upper respiratory tract infection, initial insomnia, diarrhea, and fatigue. Serious TEAEs were reported in 11.0% and 15.3% of pts on mitapivat and placebo, respectively; 2.3% and 1.2%, respectively, were considered treatment-related. Discontinuation due to TEAEs occurred in 5.8% of pts on mitapivat and 1.2% on placebo. Conclusions: In a globally representative population with TD-α- or β-thalassemia, mitapivat vs placebo significantly reduced transfusion burden and demonstrated a durable reduction of up to 36 weeks (Weeks 13-48). Mitapivat was generally safe and well tolerated with a low treatment discontinuation rate. These data, alongside data in NTD-α- or β-thalassemia from ENERGIZE, demonstrate the efficacy of mitapivat across the full range of thalassemia, supporting it as a potential oral disease-modifying therapy.