Litcius/Paper detail

Revisiting the factor structure and construct validity of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire.

Zachary T. Goodman, Kiara R. Timpano, María M. Llabre, Sierra A. Bainter

2022Psychological Assessment26 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

= 19.54) was drawn from the Nathan Kline Institute-Rockland Sample. Previously published CFQ factor structures were compared via confirmatory factor analysis and the unique variance explained by each factor was assessed. Next, we related the CFQ latent variables to neuropsychological tasks and symptom measures of depression, anxiety domains, inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. A single-factor model was best supported by the data, indicating that the CFQ represents a global measure of subjective cognitive difficulties rather than errors in specific domains. Scores on the CFQ did not predict poorer performance on objective neuropsychological tasks but were related to a range of psychological distress symptoms. Subscales derived from previously published factor structures may provide misleading impressions of the construct validity of the CFQ and are not recommended for use in future research or clinical contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Topics & Concepts

PsychologyPsycINFOConstruct validityPsychometricsClinical psychologyNeuropsychologyConfirmatory factor analysisImpulsivityCognitionConstruct (python library)AnxietyConvergent validityTest validityDevelopmental psychologyDiscriminant validityStructural equation modelingPsychiatryMEDLINEPolitical scienceMathematicsInternal consistencyProgramming languageLawComputer scienceStatisticsAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderCognitive Functions and MemoryMind wandering and attention