Lung mechanical properties distinguish children with asthma with normal and diminished lung function
Pasquale Comberiati, Joseph D. Spahn, Keith Paull, Anna Faino, Reuben M. Cherniack, Ronina Covar
Abstract
Abstract Background Children with asthma, even those with severe persistent disease, can have forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) values ≥100% of predicted, while others have diminished FEV 1 . Objective We sought to characterize the lung mechanical properties underlying these two asthma phenotypes and the mechanisms explaining the paradox of severe asthmatic children, whom when clinically stable can have an FEV 1 >100% of predicted, but during an acute bronchospastic episode can experience a life‐threatening asthma event. Methods Lung mechanics were evaluated in three groups of children: asthmatics with FEV 1 ≥100% (HFEV 1 ; n = 13), asthmatics with FEV 1 ≤80% (LFEV 1 ; n = 14) and non‐asthmatic controls (n = 10). A linear mixed model was used to examine the relationship between volume and static transpulmonary pressures obtained at total lung capacity (TLC); actual TLC %of predicted and flow; and static transpulmonary pressure and flow. Results HFEV 1 asthmatics had larger airways (FEV 1 z‐scores 1.12 vs −2.37; P < .05), greater lung volumes (mean % of predicted TLC 134.8% vs 109.6%; P < .05) and lower airway resistance (mean %of predicted Raw 101.9% vs 199.9%; P < .05) compared to the LFEV 1 group. Moreover, HFEV 1 asthmatics had significantly reduced elastic recoil pressure (pressure‐volume curve shifted upward and to the left) and higher lung compliance (0.21 vs 00.9 L/cm H 2 O; P < .05) compared to the LFEV 1 group. The pressure‐flow curves revealed the LFEV 1 group to have significantly increased resistance to flow in the upstream segment of the airways at all lung volumes studied compared to HFEV 1 . Conclusion and Clinical Relevance HFEV 1 asthmatic children display distinct lung mechanical proprieties compared to their LFEV 1 asthmatic peers. With loss of elastic recoil pressure, the HFEV 1 group could generate normal FEV 1 due to proportionally enlarged airways and reduced airway resistance, while airflow limitation in the LFEV 1 is due to increased airway resistance. Loss of elastic recoil and interdependence during acute bronchoconstriction episodes may predispose the HFEV 1 group to catastrophic reductions in airflow.