Practical methods for segmentation and calculation of brain volume and intracranial volume: a guide and comparison
Thomas Harkey, David L. Baker, John C. Hagen, H. William Scott, Viktoras Palys
Abstract
Background: Accurate segmentation and calculation of total brain volume (BV) and intracranial volume (ICV) (further-volumetry) may serve various clinical tasks and research studies in neuroscience. Manual segmentation is extremely time consuming. There is a relative lack of published broad recommendations and comparisons of tools for automated volumetry, especially for users without expertise in computer science, for settings with limited resources, and when neuroimaging quality is suboptimal due to clinical circumstances. Our objective is to decrease the barrier to entry for research and clinical groups to perform volumetric cranial imaging analysis using free and reliable software tools. Methods: ) and Bland-Altman (B-A) plots. A multifaceted comparison between 3D Slicer, FreeSurfer, and volBrain from practical user perspective was performed to compile a list of distinguishing features. Results: BV: FreeSurfer, 3D Slicer, and volBrain provide similar estimations when high quality T1-MRI scans with 1 mm slices (3D scans) are available, whereas 3 mm and thicker slices (2D scans) introduce a dispersion in results. ICV: the most accurate volumetry is provided by 3D Slicer using CT scans. volBrain uses T1-MRIs and also provides good results which agree with 3D Slicer. Both of these methods may be more trustworthy than T1 MRI-derived FreeSurfer calculations. Conclusions: All three studied tools of automated intracranial and brain volumetry-3D Slicer, FreeSurfer, and volBrain-are free, reliable, require no complex programming, but still have certain limitations and significant differences. Based on our investigation findings, the readers should be able to select the right volumetry tool and neuroimaging study, and then follow provided step-by-step instructions to accomplish specific volumetry tasks.