American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering
Jerry J. Sweet, Robert L. Heilbronner, Joel E. Morgan, Glenn J. Larrabee, Martin L. Rohling, Kyle B. Boone, Michael W. Kirkwood, Ryan W. Schroeder, Julie A. Suhr, Conference Participants
Abstract
In order to provide bases for diagnoses and interpretations, the current consensus is that all clinical and forensic evaluations must proactively address the degree to which results of neuropsychological and psychological testing are valid. There is a strong and continually-growing evidence-based literature on which practitioners can confidently base their judgments regarding the selection and interpretation of validity measures.
Topics & Concepts
PsychologyMalingeringTerminologySystematic reviewEvidence-based practiceNeuropsychologyMEDLINEClinical neuropsychologyApplied psychologyClinical psychologyMedical educationMedicinePsychiatryAlternative medicinePolitical scienceCognitionLinguisticsPhilosophyLawPathologyTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchPsychological Testing and AssessmentClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills