Comparison of Hemispheric Surgery Techniques for Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hemispheric surgery effectively treats unihemispheric pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) by resecting and/or disconnecting the epileptic hemisphere. Modifications to the original anatomic hemispherectomy have generated multiple functionally equivalent, disconnective techniques for performing hemispheric surgery, termed functional hemispherotomy. While a myriad of hemispherotomy variants exist, all of them can be categorized according to the anatomic plane they are performed in, which includes vertical approaches at or near the interhemispheric fissure and lateral approaches at or near the Sylvian fissure. This meta-analysis of individual patient data (IPD) aimed to compare seizure outcomes and complications between the hemispherotomy approaches to better characterize their relative efficacy and safety in the modern neurosurgical treatment of pediatric DRE, given emerging evidence that outcomes may differ between them. METHODS: test compared the frequency of seizure freedom and complications. Multivariable mixed-effects Cox regression controlling for predictors of seizure outcome was performed on propensity score-matched patients to compare time-to-seizure recurrence between approaches. Kaplan-Meier curves were made to visualize differences in time-to-seizure recurrence. RESULTS: < 0.001). After propensity score matching, vertical hemispherotomy approaches independently conferred longer time-to-seizure recurrence than lateral hemispherotomy approaches (hazard ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.19-0.98). DISCUSSION: Among functional hemispherotomy techniques, vertical hemispherotomy approaches confer more durable seizure freedom than lateral approaches without compromising safety. Future prospective studies are required to definitively determine whether vertical approaches are indeed superior and how it should influence clinical guidelines for performing hemispheric surgery.

Topics & Concepts