Litcius/Paper detail

Talking About Responsible Quantum: “Awareness Is the Absolute Minimum that … We Need to Do”

Tara Roberson

2023NanoEthics22 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Hype over novel quantum technologies has prompted discussion on the likely societal impacts of the sector. Calls to ensure the responsible development of quantum technologies are complicated by a lack of concrete case studies or real-world examples of irresponsible quantum. At this stage, responsible quantum faces a situation reminiscent of the Collingridge dilemma. In this dilemma, the moment in which discussion on societal risks and benefits can be most impactful is also the time when the least information is available. The flipside of this challenge is an opportunity to build processes for examining the public good of quantum before the trajectory (and potential problems) of the sector become “locked in”. Recent work in this space has argued that quantum researchers and innovators must work with society to address uncertainties and concerns. By engaging quantum stakeholders and understanding their perspectives on responsibility, this paper seeks to support this proposition and enable further dialogue on responsible development and use of quantum technologies.

Topics & Concepts

DilemmaPhilosophy of sciencePhilosophy of technologyWork (physics)QuantumQuantum technologySociologyPolitical scienceEngineering ethicsComputer scienceEpistemologyEngineeringOpen quantum systemPhysicsQuantum mechanicsPhilosophyQuantum Mechanics and Applications
Talking About Responsible Quantum: “Awareness Is the Absolute Minimum that … We Need to Do” | Litcius