Investigation of the applicability of TiO<sub>2</sub>, BiVO<sub>4</sub>, and WO<sub>3</sub> nanomaterials for advanced photocatalytic membranes used for oil‐in‐water emulsion separation
Érika Nascimbén Santos, Áron Ágoston, Szabolcs Kertész, Cecília Hodúr, Zsuzsanna László, Zsolt Pap, Zsolt Kása, Tünde Alapi, S. A. Gokula Krishnan, G. Arthanareeswaran, Klára Hernádi, Gábor Veréb
Abstract
Abstract In the present study, a commercial TiO 2 , several BiVO 4 photocatalysts, a WO 3 nanomaterial, and their composites were used to prepare photocatalytic polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) ultrafilter membranes. Their photocatalytic activities and the effects of coatings on the filtration of oil‐in‐water emulsion (crude oil; c oil = 100 mg L −1 ) were investigated. Fluxes, filtration resistances, purification efficiencies, and fouling resistance abilities—like flux decay ratios (FDRs) and flux recovery ratios (FRRs)—were compared. The solar light‐induced photocatalytic decomposition of the foulants was also investigated. WO 3 was used as a composite component to suppress the electron–hole recombination with the goal of achieving higher photocatalytic activity, but the presence of WO 3 was not beneficial concerning the filtration properties. However, the application of TiO 2 , one of the investigated BiVO 4 photocatalysts, and their composites was also beneficial. In the case of the neat membrane, only 87 L m −2 h −1 flux was measured, whereas with the most beneficial BiVO 4 coating, 464 L m −2 h −1 flux was achieved. Pure BiVO 4 coating was more beneficial in terms of filtration properties, whereas pure TiO 2 coating proved to be more beneficial concerning the photocatalytic regeneration of the membrane. The TiO 2 (80%)/BiVO 4 (20%) composite was estimated to be the most beneficial combination taking into account both the aspects of photocatalytic activity and filtration properties.