Litcius/Paper detail

Micro-bumping, Hybrid Bonding, or Monolithic? A PPA Study for Heterogeneous 3D IC Options

Jinwoo Kim, Lingjun Zhu, Hakki Mert Torun, Madhavan Swaminathan, Sung Kyu Lim

202119 citationsDOI

Abstract

In this paper, we present three commercial-grade 3D IC designs based on state-of-the-art design technologies, specifically micro-bumping (3D die stacking), hybrid bonding (wafer-on-wafer bonding) and monolithic 3D IC (M3D). To highlight trade-offs present in these three designs, we perform analyses on power, performance, and area and the clock tree. We also model the tier-to-tier interconnection in each 3D IC methodology and analyze signal integrity to assess the reliability of each design. From our experiments, hybrid bonding design shows the best timing improvement of 81.4% when compared to its 2D counterpart, while micro-bumping shows the best reliability among 3D IC designs.

Topics & Concepts

BumpingInterconnectionReliability (semiconductor)Three-dimensional integrated circuitComputer scienceReliability engineeringStackingIntegrated circuitElectronic engineeringEmbedded systemComputer architectureMaterials sciencePower (physics)EngineeringOptoelectronicsMechanical engineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsNuclear magnetic resonance3D IC and TSV technologiesElectronic Packaging and Soldering TechnologiesVLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Micro-bumping, Hybrid Bonding, or Monolithic? A PPA Study for Heterogeneous 3D IC Options | Litcius