Prognostic Value of Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor PET/CT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas and Comparison with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT: A Single-Center Prospective Study
Louise Madeleine Risør, Malene Martini Clausen, Z. Ujmajuridze, Mohammed Farhadi, Kim Francis Andersen, Annika Loft, Jeppe Friborg, Andreas Kjær
Abstract
<b>Purpose:</b> The aim of this phase II trial (NCT02965001) was to evaluate the prognostic value of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR)-PET/CT with the novel ligand <sup>68</sup>Ga-NOTA-AE105 in head and neck cancer and compare it to <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG). <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) referred to curatively intended radiotherapy were eligible and prospectively included in this phase II study. A <sup>68</sup>Ga-uPAR- and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT were performed before initiation of curatively intended radiotherapy and maximum standardized uptake values (SUV<sub>max</sub>) of the primary tumor was measured on both PET/CTs by two independent readers. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated and optimal cut-off values were established for <sup>68</sup>Ga-uPAR- and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET independently and compared using log rank and Kaplan-Meier statistics, and univariate and multivariate analysis in Cox proportional hazards model. <b>Results:</b> A total of 57 patients were included and followed for a median of 33.8 months (range 2.30-47.2). The median SUV<sub>max</sub> of the primary tumors were 2.98 (range 1.94-5.24) for <sup>68</sup>Ga-uPAR and 15.7 (range 4.24-45.5) for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG. The optimal cut-off points for <sup>68</sup>Ga-NOTA-AE105 SUV<sub>max</sub> in the primary tumor was 2.63 for RFS and 2.66 for OS. A high uptake of <sup>68</sup>Ga-NOTA-AE105 (SUV<sub>max</sub> above cut-off) was significantly associated with poor RFS and OS (log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.012 and <i>P</i> = 0.022). <sup>68</sup>Ga-NOTA-AE105-uptake in the primary tumor was significantly associated with poor RFS in univariate analysis (HR=8.53 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-64.7), <i>P</i> = 0.038) and borderline associated with OS (HR=7.44 (95% CI 0.98-56.4), <i>P</i> = 0.052). For <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET, the optimal cut-off points were 22.7 for RFS and 22.9 for OS. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG SUV<sub>max</sub> above cut-off was significantly associated with reduced RFS (log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.012) and OS (log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.000). <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-uptake was significantly associated with reduced RFS and OS in univariate analysis (HR=3.27; 95% CI 1.237-8.66), <i>P</i> = 0.017) and (HR=7.10; 95% CI 2.60-19.4), p<0.001). In a multivariate analysis including <sup>68</sup>Ga-uPAR SUV<sub>max</sub>, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG SUV<sub>max</sub>, Tumor, Node and Metastasis (TNM) stage and p16 status, only <sup>68</sup>Ga-uPAR SUV<sub>max</sub> remained significant (HR 8.51 (95%CI 1.08-66.9), <i>P</i> = 0.042) for RFS. For OS, only TNM stage and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG remained significant. <b>Conclusion:</b> The current phase II clinical trial showed promising results for the use of <sup>68</sup>Ga-uPAR-PET SUV<sub>max</sub> in the primary tumor to predict RFS in HNSCC patients referred to curatively intended radiotherapy when compared to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET, TNM stage and p16 status. <sup>68</sup>Ga-uPAR-PET could potentially become valuable for identification of patients suited for de-escalation of treatment and risk stratified follow-up schemes.