Litcius/Paper detail

Urban Boundary Layers Over Dense and Tall Canopies

Alexandros Makedonas, Matteo Carpentieri, Marco Placidi

2021Boundary-Layer Meteorology20 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Wind-tunnel experiments were carried out on four urban morphologies: two tall canopies with uniform height and two super-tall canopies with a large variation in element heights (where the maximum element height is more than double the average canopy height, $$h_{max}=2.5h_{avg}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>max</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>avg</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ). The average canopy height and packing density are fixed across the surfaces to $$h_{avg} = 80~\hbox {mm}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>avg</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>80</mml:mn> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mtext>mm</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , and $$\lambda _{p} = 0.44$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.44</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , respectively. A combination of laser Doppler anemometry and direct-drag measurements are used to calculate and scale the mean velocity profiles with the boundary-layer depth $$\delta $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> </mml:math> . In the uniform-height experiment, the high packing density results in a ‘skimming flow’ regime with very little flow penetration into the canopy. This leads to a surprisingly shallow roughness sublayer (depth $$\approx 1.15h_{avg}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>≈</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1.15</mml:mn> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>avg</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ), and a well-defined inertial sublayer above it. In the heterogeneous-height canopies, despite the same packing density and average height, the flow features are significantly different. The height heterogeneity enhances mixing, thus encouraging deep flow penetration into the canopy. A deeper roughness sublayer is found to exist extending up to just above the tallest element height (corresponding to $$z/h_{avg} = 2.85$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>z</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>avg</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2.85</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ), which is found to be the dominant length scale controlling the flow behaviour. Results point toward the existence of a constant-stress layer for all surfaces considered herein despite the severity of the surface roughness ( $$\delta /h_{avg} = 3 - 6.25$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>avg</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>6.25</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ). This contrasts with the previous literature.

Topics & Concepts

Surface finishGeologyFlow (mathematics)Penetration depthGeometryPenetration (warfare)Boundary layerInertial frame of referenceLength scaleReynolds numberLaminar sublayerFlow velocitySphere packingBoundary (topology)Surface roughnessLidarDensity of airScale (ratio)MeteorologyMean flowDoppler effectAirflowMechanicsShear velocityWind and Air Flow StudiesSeismic and Structural Analysis of Tall BuildingsUrban Heat Island Mitigation