Litcius/Paper detail

Smear layer removal by passive ultrasonic irrigation and 2 new mechanical methods for activation of the chelating solution

Ricardo Machado, Isadora da Silva, Daniel Comparin, Bianca C. Mattos, Luiz Rômulo Alberton, Ulisses Xavier da Silva Neto

2021Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics15 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare smear layer removal by conventional application (CA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), EasyClean (EC), and XP-Endo Finisher (XPF), using 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) after chemomechanical preparation, as evaluated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: < 0.05). RESULTS: > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: No irrigation method was able to completely remove the smear layer, especially in the apical third. Using CA for the chelating solution performed better than any form of activation.

Topics & Concepts

Smear layerEthylenediaminetetraacetic acidChelationDistilled waterPositive controlChemistryDentistryRoot canalNegative controlScanning electron microscopeNuclear chemistrySignificant differenceMaterials scienceChromatographyMedicineInorganic chemistryTraditional medicineComposite materialInternal medicineEndodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsDental Radiography and ImagingDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Smear layer removal by passive ultrasonic irrigation and 2 new mechanical methods for activation of the chelating solution | Litcius