Litcius/Paper detail

Is GPT-4 a reliable rater? Evaluating consistency in GPT-4's text ratings

Veronika Hackl, Alexandra Elena Müller, Michael Granitzer, Maximilian Sailer

2023Frontiers in Education69 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

This study reports the Intraclass Correlation Coefficients of feedback ratings produced by OpenAI's GPT-4, a large language model (LLM), across various iterations, time frames, and stylistic variations. The model was used to rate responses to tasks related to macroeconomics in higher education (HE), based on their content and style. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the absolute agreement and consistency of ratings in all iterations, and the correlation between the ratings in terms of content and style. The findings revealed high interrater reliability, with ICC scores ranging from 0.94 to 0.99 for different time periods, indicating that GPT-4 is capable of producing consistent ratings. The prompt used in this study is also presented and explained.

Topics & Concepts

Inter-rater reliabilityIntraclass correlationConsistency (knowledge bases)Reliability (semiconductor)StatisticsCorrelationPsychologyStyle (visual arts)EconometricsMathematicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePsychometricsRating scaleGeographyArchaeologyGeometryQuantum mechanicsPhysicsPower (physics)Online Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEducational Assessment and Pedagogy
Is GPT-4 a reliable rater? Evaluating consistency in GPT-4's text ratings | Litcius