Attention‐based Deep Learning for the Preoperative Differentiation of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer on DCE‐MRI
Jing Gao, Xin Zhong, Wenjuan Li, Qin Li, Huafei Shao, Zhongyi Wang, Yi Dai, Heng Ma, Ying–Hong Shi, Han Zhang, Shaofeng Duan, Kun Zhang, Ping Yang, Feng Zhao, Haicheng Zhang, Haizhu Xie, Ning Mao
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have explored the potential on radiomics features of primary breast cancer tumor to identify axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis. However, the value of deep learning (DL) to identify ALN metastasis remains unclear. PURPOSE: To investigate the potential of the proposed attention-based DL model for the preoperative differentiation of ALN metastasis in breast cancer on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: A total of 941 breast cancer patients who underwent DCE-MRI before surgery were included in the training (742 patients), internal test (83 patients), and external test (116 patients) cohorts. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 3.0 T MR scanner, DCE-MRI sequence. ASSESSMENT: A DL model containing a 3D deep residual network (ResNet) architecture and a convolutional block attention module, named RCNet, was proposed for ALN metastasis identification. Three RCNet models were established based on the tumor, ALN, and combined tumor-ALN regions on the images. The performance of these models was compared with ResNet models, radiomics models, the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) model, and three radiologists (W.L., H.S., and F. L.). STATISTICAL TESTS: Dice similarity coefficient for breast tumor and ALN segmentation. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, intercorrelation and intracorrelation coefficients, area under the curve (AUC), and Delong test for ALN classification. RESULTS: , the radiologists' performance was improved (external test cohort, P < 0.05). DATA CONCLUSION: DCE-MRI-based RCNet model could provide a noninvasive auxiliary tool to identify ALN metastasis preoperatively in breast cancer, which may assist radiologists in conducting more accurate evaluation of ALN status. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.