Gender-based time discrepancy in diagnosis of coronary artery disease based on data analytics of electronic medical records
Maryam Panahiazar, Andrew Bishara, Yorick Chern, Roohallah Alizadehsani, Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam, Dexter Hadley, Rima Arnaout, Ramin E. Beygui
Abstract
Background: Women continue to have worse Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) outcomes than men. The causes of this discrepancy have yet to be fully elucidated. The main objective of this study is to detect gender discrepancies in the diagnosis and treatment of CAD. Methods: We used data analytics to risk stratify ~32,000 patients with CAD of the total 960,129 patients treated at the UCSF Medical Center over an 8 year period. We implemented a multidimensional data analytics framework to trace patients from admission through treatment to create a path of events. Events are any medications or noninvasive and invasive procedures. The time between events for a similar set of paths was calculated. Then, the average waiting time for each step of the treatment was calculated. Finally, we applied statistical analysis to determine differences in time between diagnosis and treatment steps for men and women. Results: value = 0.000119), while the time difference from diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization to CABG is not statistically significant. Conclusion: Women had a significantly longer interval between their first physician encounter indicative of CAD and their first diagnostic cardiac catheterization compared to men. Avoiding this delay in diagnosis may provide more timely treatment and a better outcome for patients at risk. Finally, we conclude by discussing the impact of the study on improving patient care with early detection and managing individual patients at risk of rapid progression of CAD.