Litcius/Paper detail

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) nonresponders in the contemporary era: A state-of-the-art review

Luigi Gerra, Niccolò Bonini, Davide Antonio Mei, Jacopo Francesco Imberti, Marco Vitolo, Tommaso Bucci, Giuseppe Boriani, Gregory Y.H. Lip

2024Heart Rhythm30 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

In the 2000s, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) became a revolutionary treatment for heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) and wide QRS. However, about one-third of CRT recipients do not show a favorable response. This review of the current literature aims to better define the concept of CRT response/nonresponse. The diagnosis of CRT nonresponder should be viewed as a continuum, and it cannot rely solely on a single parameter. Moreover, baseline features of some patients might predict an unfavorable response. A strong collaboration between heart failure specialists and electrophysiologists is key to overcoming this challenge with multiple strategies. In the contemporary era, new pacing modalities, such as His-bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing, represent a promising alternative to CRT. Observational studies have demonstrated their potential; however, several limitations should be addressed. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to prove their efficacy in HFrEF with electromechanical dyssynchrony.

Topics & Concepts

Cardiac resynchronization therapyMedicineHeart failureCardiologyEjection fractionInternal medicineQRS complexObservational studyRandomized controlled trialLeft bundle branch blockModalitiesSociologySocial scienceCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias